LANGHAM’S SUSIE

LANGHAM’S SUSIE

Dog Information

Registration No. APBT-12817
Weight
DNA

Parents

History & Notes

No approved history or notes have been recorded for this dog yet.

Contribute History & Notes

Submit documented history, research notes, living or deceased information, or other relevant facts about this dog.

All submissions are reviewed by a PitPeds administrator before becoming part of the official dog record.

Log in to submit History & Notes

Explore

Contribute

Help keep PitPeds accurate. Submit corrections for administrator review.

Found incorrect information?

You must be logged in with an active PitPeds membership to suggest a correction.

Log In

Pinch to zoom • drag to move
Sire's Sire's SireUnknown
Sire's Sire's DamUnknown
Sire's Dam's SireTUDOR’S DIBO
Sire's Dam's DamUnknown
Dam's Sire's SireHUBBARD’S GIMP
Dam's Sire's DamHUBBARD’S LENA
Dam's Dam's SireHUBBARD’S GIMP
Dam's Dam's DamHUBBARD’S LENA
Pinch to zoom • drag to move
Sire's Sire's SireUnknown
Sire's Sire's DamUnknown
Sire's Dam's SireTUDOR’S DIBO
Sire's Dam's DamUnknown
Dam's Sire's SireHUBBARD’S GIMP
Dam's Sire's DamHUBBARD’S LENA
Dam's Dam's SireHUBBARD’S GIMP
Dam's Dam's DamHUBBARD’S LENA

PitPeds Pedigree Intelligence

Pedigree Analysis

See which ancestors have the greatest repeated influence throughout this pedigree.

This analysis is estimated from pedigree positions and is not a laboratory DNA test.

Pedigree COI

Coefficient of Inbreeding

Estimated from the known sire and dam ancestry within the selected 10-generation pedigree.

6.79% Pedigree COI
Common Ancestor Contributions 6 qualifying ancestors

Plus 1 additional qualifying common ancestor.

Pedigree COI is calculated from known pedigree relationships within the selected depth. Unknown or incomplete ancestry can cause the displayed percentage to underestimate the dog's true pedigree inbreeding.

Most Influential Ancestor

HUBBARD’S (CORVINO’S) BOUNCE

31.25% Repeated influence
2 Deeper-generation appearances
31.25% Total estimated contribution

Top Dominant Ancestors

These ancestors have the strongest repeated influence from Generation 3 and deeper.

31.25% repeated influence 2 appearances
29.69% repeated influence 5 appearances
28.91% repeated influence 4 appearances
26.56% repeated influence 2 appearances
25.00% repeated influence 1 appearance

Pedigree Concentration

This chart shows how the known repeated pedigree influence is divided among the dominant ancestors.

31.25% repeated influence 2 appearances
29.69% repeated influence 5 appearances
28.91% repeated influence 4 appearances
26.56% repeated influence 2 appearances
25.00% repeated influence 1 appearance
Other Known Ancestors 54.86%
Combined influence from the remaining known ancestors

Detailed Pedigree Analysis

Review estimated contribution, repeated influence, appearances, and pedigree generations.

Ancestor Repeated Influence Total Contribution Appearances Generations
HUBBARD’S (CORVINO’S) BOUNCE 31.25% 31.25% 2 G3, G5
HUBBARD’S GIMP 29.69% 29.69% 5 G4, G6, G8
HUBBARD’S LENA 28.91% 28.91% 4 G4, G6, G8
HUBBARD’S CISSY 26.56% 26.56% 2 G3, G7
HEINZL’S ROBIN 25.00% 25.00% 1 G3
HEINZL’S POLLY (2XW) (1XL) 25.00% 25.00% 1 G3
CUNNINGHAM’S BOXER ( AKA CORVINO’S GIMP ) 14.84% 14.84% 5 G5, G7, G9
TUDOR’S ( CORVINO’S ) GOLDIE 14.84% 14.84% 5 G5, G7, G9
BRUCE’S JERRY 14.65% 14.65% 9 G6, G8, G10
FLY OF PANAMA (AKA CUNNINGHAM’S FLY) 14.65% 14.65% 9 G6, G8, G10
CORVINO’S SHORTY 14.45% 14.45% 4 G5, G7, G9
CHICAGO DOLLY 14.45% 14.45% 4 G5, G7, G9
TUDOR’S DIBO 12.50% 12.50% 1 G4
SHIPLEY’S RED JERRY 7.42% 7.42% 5 G6, G8, G10
TUDOR’S FLASH 7.42% 7.42% 5 G6, G8, G10
SALIBAS’ MICKEY 7.23% 7.23% 4 G6, G8, G10
SALIBAS’ PEGGY 7.23% 7.23% 4 G6, G8, G10
HEINZL’S ( RITCHESON’S ) BAMBI 6.25% 6.25% 1 G5
RITCHESON’S SPIKE 3.13% 3.13% 1 G6
RITCHESON’S SPOTTY 3.13% 3.13% 1 G6
BROWN’S BRINDLE SPIKE 1.56% 1.56% 1 G7
BROWN’S BLONDE SCRATCH 1.56% 1.56% 1 G7
RITCHESON’S GEEP 1.56% 1.56% 1 G7
LANGHAM’S COTTON 0.00% 50.00% 1 G2
DOLAN’S SAPHIRE 0.00% 50.00% 1 G2