TANT’S TOE JAM ROM

TANT’S TOE JAM ROM

Dog Information

Registration No.
Weight
DNA

Parents

History & Notes

No approved history or notes have been recorded for this dog yet.

Contribute History & Notes

Submit documented history, research notes, living or deceased information, or other relevant facts about this dog.

All submissions are reviewed by a PitPeds administrator before becoming part of the official dog record.

Log in to submit History & Notes

Explore

Contribute

Help keep PitPeds accurate. Submit corrections for administrator review.

Found incorrect information?

You must be logged in with an active PitPeds membership to suggest a correction.

Log In

PitPeds Pedigree Intelligence

Pedigree Analysis

See which ancestors have the greatest repeated influence throughout this pedigree.

This analysis is estimated from pedigree positions and is not a laboratory DNA test.

Pedigree COI

Coefficient of Inbreeding

Estimated from the known sire and dam ancestry within the selected 10-generation pedigree.

34.13% Pedigree COI
Common Ancestor Contributions 3 qualifying ancestors

Pedigree COI is calculated from known pedigree relationships within the selected depth. Unknown or incomplete ancestry can cause the displayed percentage to underestimate the dog's true pedigree inbreeding.

Most Influential Ancestor

BASS TRAMP RED BOY (2XW) ROM

48.44% Repeated influence
9 Deeper-generation appearances
48.44% Total estimated contribution

Top Dominant Ancestors

These ancestors have the strongest repeated influence from Generation 3 and deeper.

48.44% repeated influence 9 appearances
37.50% repeated influence 2 appearances
37.50% repeated influence 2 appearances
36.33% repeated influence 18 appearances
28.13% repeated influence 4 appearances

Pedigree Concentration

This chart shows how the known repeated pedigree influence is divided among the dominant ancestors.

48.44% repeated influence 9 appearances
37.50% repeated influence 2 appearances
37.50% repeated influence 2 appearances
36.33% repeated influence 18 appearances
28.13% repeated influence 4 appearances
Other Known Ancestors 52.04%
Combined influence from the remaining known ancestors

Detailed Pedigree Analysis

Review estimated contribution, repeated influence, appearances, and pedigree generations.

Ancestor Repeated Influence Total Contribution Appearances Generations
BASS TRAMP RED BOY (2XW) ROM 48.44% 48.44% 9 G4, G5, G6, G7
CH CHAVIS’ YELLOW JOHN (4XW) ROM 37.50% 37.50% 2 G3, G4
TANT’S MISS JOCKO (2XW) ROM 37.50% 37.50% 2 G3, G4
TEAL’S JEFF  36.33% 36.33% 18 G5, G6, G7, G8, G9
CH CHAVIS’ JOCKO (4XW) POR 28.13% 28.13% 4 G4, G5, G6
GR CH TANT’S YELLOW (6XW) ROM 25.00% 75.00% 2 G2, G3
TANT’S PENNY 25.00% 25.00% 1 G3
MC LEOD’S SUSIE Q GAL 24.22% 24.22% 9 G5, G6, G7, G8
MARLOWE’S RED FEATHER 18.75% 18.75% 2 G4, G5
CHAVIS’ LADY ROSE (1XL) 18.75% 18.75% 2 G4, G5
MARLOWE’S BRANDY GIRL 18.75% 18.75% 2 G4, G5
CH JACKSON’S HANK 14.06% 14.06% 4 G5, G6, G7
RAST’S QUEENIE 14.06% 14.06% 4 G5, G6, G7
BASS’ CLEO 14.06% 14.06% 4 G5, G6, G7
MARLOWE’S MR. BULLDOG 12.50% 12.50% 1 G4
BASS’S CAT 9.38% 9.38% 2 G5, G6
CH CHAVIS’ LADY SASSY MEAD 9.38% 9.38% 2 G5, G6
TANT’S LOLA 0.00% 50.00% 1 G2